- Visibility 23 Views
- Downloads 16 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI 10.18231/j.jdp.12155.1759131119
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Evaluation of microleakage in Class V restorations using ketac™ N100 and equia forte™: A comparative in vitro study
Objective: This study evaluates and compares the marginal sealing ability of two advanced glass ionomer-based restorative materials—Ketac™ N100 and Equia Forte™—in Class V cavities.
Materials and Methods: Thirty extracted, non-carious human premolars were prepared with standardized Class V cavities on buccal and lingual surfaces. Group 1 (n=15) was restored with Ketac™ N100, while Group 2 (n=15) received Equia Forte™ restorations. Following thermocycling (200 cycles between 5°C and 55°C), specimens were subjected to methylene blue dye penetration testing. Dye infiltration was analyzed under 50 x stereomicroscope, and microleakage scores were recorded and statistically evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: Equia Forte™ demonstrated significantly reduced microleakage at both occlusal and gingival margins compared to Ketac™ N100 (P < 0.05). Both materials showed higher leakage at the gingival margins.
Conclusion: Equia Forte™ offered better sealing performance in Class V restorations, suggesting a more effective barrier against microleakage in challenging cervical areas.
References
- Hempton TJ, Ovadia R, McManama JC, Bonacci FJ. Addressing cervical Class V lesions. Dimen Dent Hygiene. 2010; 8(3):48-51.
- Norling BK. Bonding. In: Anusavice KJ, editor. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 11th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2003;386-7.
- Muliyar S, Shameem KA, Thankachan RP, Francis PG, Jayapalan CS, Hafiz KA. Microleakage in endodontics. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):99-104.
- Irie M, Tanaka J, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G. Vertical and horizontal polymerization shrinkage in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2014;30(7):189-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.018
[Google Scholar] - Murray PE, Hafez AA, Smith AJ, Cox CF. Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2002;18:470–82. DOI: 10.1016/s0109-
[Google Scholar] 5641(01)00072-0 - Garcia-Júnior E, Lopes BKB, Carvalho FK, Silva RAB, Souza FCPP, Consolaro A. et al. Resin-modified glass ionomer nanocomposite: Subcutaneous connective tissue response and polymerization shrinkage resistance. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clín Integr. 2025;25:230229. DOI:10.1590/pboci.2025.069
[Google Scholar] - GC Europe. EQUIA Forte® HT: Bulk fill glass hybrid restorative system brochure. GCEurope. 2019. Available From: https://cdn.vivarep.com/contrib/vivarep/media/pdf/2_64
- Miletic V, et al. Clinical performance of a glass hybrid system compared with a resin composite in the posterior region: Results of a 2-year multicenter study. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(3):235–47. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a44547
[Google Scholar] - Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgunaltay G. Microleakage of different resin composite types. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(10):790-4.
- Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, et al. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):134–43. DOI: 10.2341/13-239-C
[Google Scholar] - Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN. Five-year randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid- modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent. 2003;5(4):323–32.
- Tyas MJ. The Class V lesion—Aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J. 1995;40(3):167–70. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1995.tb05631.x
[Google Scholar] - Perdigão J, Swift EJ. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Swift EJ, eds. Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 5th ed. Mosby; 2006.
- Chandra PVR, Harikumar V, Ramkiran D, Krishna MJN, Gouda MV. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self- etching adhesives: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2013;14(1):51-5. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1269
[Google Scholar] - Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Sensitivity restored of Class V abrasion/erosion lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 1990;121(6):694-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0269
[Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Singla R, Uppal AS. Evaluation of microleakage in Class V restorations using ketac™ N100 and equia forte™: A comparative in vitro study [Internet]. J Dent Panacea. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 29];7(3):142-144. Available from: https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.12155.1759131119
APA
Singla, R., Uppal, A. S. (2025). Evaluation of microleakage in Class V restorations using ketac™ N100 and equia forte™: A comparative in vitro study. J Dent Panacea, 7(3), 142-144. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.12155.1759131119
MLA
Singla, Ruchi, Uppal, Amandeep Singh. "Evaluation of microleakage in Class V restorations using ketac™ N100 and equia forte™: A comparative in vitro study." J Dent Panacea, vol. 7, no. 3, 2025, pp. 142-144. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.12155.1759131119
Chicago
Singla, R., Uppal, A. S.. "Evaluation of microleakage in Class V restorations using ketac™ N100 and equia forte™: A comparative in vitro study." J Dent Panacea 7, no. 3 (2025): 142-144. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.12155.1759131119