The Journal of Dental Panacea

Online ISSN: 2348-8727

CODEN : JDP

The Journal of Dental Panacea (JDP) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal, Publish quarterly as Open Access (OA).  Vision of this journal  for better dissemination of knowledge, Journal will be publishing the article ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in JDP. Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with “Uniform requirements” of the The Journal of Dental Panacea as more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

69-72


Authors Details

Nemakal Sumana*, Chakravarthy YSHS, Ch Susmitha S S, Patcha Harika, Sravani Bontu, Dharmasanam Ramya


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 661

PDF Downloaded: 351


Evaluation and comparision of the clinical effectiveness of diode laser and Gluma as desensitizing agents in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity


Original Article

Author Details : Nemakal Sumana*, Chakravarthy YSHS, Ch Susmitha S S, Patcha Harika, Sravani Bontu, Dharmasanam Ramya

Volume : 3, Issue : 2, Year : 2021

Article Page : 69-72

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.2021.015



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

Introduction: Dentin hypersensitivity is one of the most common presenting symptoms in dental practice. It may range from mild discomfort to severe pain affecting the person. Laser desensitization has been introduced as a useful tool for the treatment of hypersensitivity. Gluma Dentin Bond is an adhesive system, where the primer contains 5% glutaraldehyde and 35% hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Practitioners have reported a strong desensitizing effect of the Gluma® system on dentin
Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical effectiveness of Diode laser and Gluma ®desensitizing agent in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity.
Materials and Methods: 24 patients aged between 20 and 50 years was included to assess tooth sensitivity, a controlled air stimulus (evaporative stimulus) was used. Sensitivity was measured using a 10-cm Visual Aanalog Scale (VAS) score. The teeth was randomly allocated to two groups i.e., Group I or II using the lottery method.
Results: Gluma® showed a statistically significant reduction in the VAS score as compared to diode laser 1, 2- and 4-weeks follow-up period (p < 0> Conclusion: The result of the present investigation revealed that application of Gluma® resulted in better control dentin hypersensitivity as compared to diode laser.
 

Keywords: Dentinal hypersensitivity, Diagnosis, VAS score, Gluma, Laser


How to cite : Sumana N, Yshs C , Ch Susmitha S S, Harika P, Bontu S, Ramya D, Evaluation and comparision of the clinical effectiveness of diode laser and Gluma as desensitizing agents in the treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Dent Panacea 2021;3(2):69-72

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work, the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.