The Journal of Dental Panacea

Online ISSN: 2348-8727

CODEN : JDP

The Journal of Dental Panacea (JDP) open access, peer-reviewed quarterly journal, Publish quarterly as Open Access (OA).  Vision of this journal  for better dissemination of knowledge, Journal will be publishing the article ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in JDP. Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with “Uniform requirements” of the The Journal of Dental Panacea as more...

Article type

Original Article


Article page

118-123


Authors Details

Priyanka Kumari*, Manish Khatri, Mansi Bansal, Komal Puri


Article Metrics


View Article As

 


Downlaod Files

   






Article statistics

Viewed: 972

PDF Downloaded: 312


Clinical evaluation of excisional new attachment procedure versus laser assisted new attachment procedure in the treatment of periodontal pockets


Original Article

Author Details : Priyanka Kumari*, Manish Khatri, Mansi Bansal, Komal Puri

Volume : 3, Issue : 3, Year : 2021

Article Page : 118-123

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jdp.2021.025



Suggest article by email

Get Permission

Abstract

TheLaser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP) protocol is a laser based periodontal regenerative procedure and was patterned, conceptually, after the Excisional New Attachment Procedure (ENAP) to separate the diseased epithelium from the underlying connective tissue and to selectively vaporize and disrupt inflamed and necrotic tissue from connective tissue.
Objective : The present study was designed to compare and evaluate the clinical efficacy of LANAP versus ENAP in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.
and Methods : Twenty periodontal pocket sites of ?5mm in systemically healthy patients were selected and randomly allocated to either (ENAP) Excisional New Attachment Procedure (Group I) or (LANAP) Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (Group II). Patients were evaluated for Plaque Index, Gingival Index, Gingival Bleeding Index, Probing Depth, Loss of attachment, recession and VAS scores. Patients were recalled for follow up at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months at which clinical parameters were recorded.
Results : The results of the present study revealed statistically insignificant difference in both groups however clinically significant reduction in probing depth was seen with ENAP as compared to LANAP but laser procedure had less VAS scores as compared to ENAP.
Although probing depth reduction was more for ENAP, patient discomfort with less bleeding was observed with LANAP.
Keywords : Laser Assisted New Attachment Procedure (LANAP), Excisional New Attachment Procedure (ENAP)


How to cite : Kumari P, Khatri M, Bansal M, Puri K, Clinical evaluation of excisional new attachment procedure versus laser assisted new attachment procedure in the treatment of periodontal pockets. J Dent Panacea 2021;3(3):118-123

This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work, the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.